I never thought adp would go along with the coronation. Even his wife refuses too. Gutless.
We've been told that Mrs. adp will vote for President-Elect Trump in the general election if the Democratic nominee is Hillary. Does the same go for adp?
I never thought adp would go along with the coronation. Even his wife refuses too. Gutless.
Not based on what he said. He's a Hillary man now. He's worked out his differences and can accept an intellectually dishonest but effective leader.We've been told that Mrs. adp will vote for President-Elect Trump in the general election if the Democratic nominee is Hillary. Does the same go for adp?
Someone asked me this the other day. What would I do if it's HRC and Trump. In all honesty, I have no clue and probably won't know until I have to actually hit the touch screen. I will say this, HRC is much better for me financially than Trump.
I honestly don't know who I would vote for either. Maybe their VP's and just assume one of them would die during their term.Someone asked me this the other day. What would I do if it's HRC and Trump. In all honesty, I have no clue and probably won't know until I have to actually hit the touch screen. I will say this, HRC is much better for me financially than Trump.
so in summary.. Happens Everywhere?What is my perspective? I think we're seeing a lack of great candidates and that's why we might be faced with a pathological lair and potential crazy man as our nominees. I've been balanced in pointing out the flaws on both sides. Anyone disagree with that view? My issue is when you or others make a comment like Trump is going to BS people into electing him. Did you forget Obama? Trump at least has done something. Obama gave speeches for 3 years and BS his way to the same thing. Let's just keep it fair and balanced. Note, you can make the same comment about Rubio....and Democrats do. So my issue is this, just apply it across the board. Let's keep it intellectually honest. Which gets to the real issue. The election process has become awful. We've got Hillary and Sanders trying to see who can come up with a more unrealistic leftist agenda that cost 45 trillion to implement. The GOP has turned into the WWE in the debates. We are to blame for Trump and Sanders. We're the same idiots who elected the community organizer.... twice. Say what you want about Romney but he would have been a good President. We let the 47% comment taken at a private fundraiser elect a President. It's all so dumb. We now have a serial abuser of women running as the candidate of women, the first women President but we're all going to focus on Trump? At least he's on the level about his insults. He doesn't pretend to be something he's not in that regard. And people like it. It's really no worse than anyone else out there.
Someone asked me this the other day. What would I do if it's HRC and Trump. In all honesty, I have no clue and probably won't know until I have to actually hit the touch screen. I will say this, HRC is much better for me financially than Trump.
What is your answer? I assume #3.
That's a Sanders-like atheist statement.If there is such a place you mean.
What is hell?Of course, I'd want four more years of Obama in comparison to four years of Trump or Hillary. I can't imagine any sensible person thinking otherwise.
President Obama has accomplished pretty much everything that he said he would when I voted for him......though obviously I hoped that he would be a little less of a Relentless, Remorseless Killing Machine. All that SOB does is kill bad guys. Going to end up in hell.
I've argued this for about 10 years. Trump vs. Hillary might give us Bloomberg. We'll see. Here is the other thing. If Trump doesn't win this outright you know the establishment will steal it from him at the convention. The idea is that if HRC is on the other side the GOP will still come out because they can't stand her. This thing has a long way to go and a number of things can still happen. Same thing would happen if HRC gets wounded/indicted by the FBI. The Dems won't let Sanders be the nominee. They'll use Super Delegates to steal it and insert Biden.I'm excited for the major independent candidate(s). When will that happen? It has to, right?
This is the stuff the drives me nuts. He hasn't "taken over". He's at 35%, less than Sanders. The GOP simply has too many people running so 35% is the most. And don't point to Nevada to suggest he's got more.I truly am amazed how trump has managed to take over the GOP, even while announcing some love for planned parenthood and providing healthcare for everyone who needs it.
This is what Cruz was saying. He was saying that if other guys left it would be a whole lot closer, but Cruz is a pyscho.This is the stuff the drives me nuts. He hasn't "taken over". He's at 35%, less than Sanders. The GOP simply has too many people running so 35% is the most. And don't point to Nevada to suggest he's got more.
The Dems won't let Sanders be the nominee
This is the stuff the drives me nuts. He hasn't "taken over". He's at 35%, less than Sanders. The GOP simply has too many people running so 35% is the most. And don't point to Nevada to suggest he's got more.
So you acknowledge he's less than Sanders. Keep it fair and balanced.I must be reading different polls that show Trump in the mid 40s
So you acknowledge he's less than Sanders. Keep it fair and balanced.
Same way the Dems use Super Delegates to pad HRC. Remember, most of the states aren't winner take all. It's not like how we vote for President with an electoral college. The primary process is a complete mess and each state makes their own rules.How can the GoP convention steal it from Trump? How would that work? I don't know anything about that process.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...lican_presidential_nomination-3823.html#polls I scrolled but don't see a single one that has him at 40.I must be reading different polls that show Trump in the mid 40s
Hillary is -1200 to get the Democratic nomination. O-V-E-R...only the naive ever thought it was in doubt.
And yes you wouldn't give me the true odds on a wager. Those ditch digger boys of yours could have used the money.
It's liberal math. Kmill is incapable of any balance in his thinking.http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...lican_presidential_nomination-3823.html#polls I scrolled but don't see a single one that has him at 40.
That's become rather clear.It's liberal math. Kmill is incapable of any balance in his thinking.
I am still unclear on how they will get someone else to win the election during the convention. Can you show me how this works. ie: Trump wins Nebraska but at the convention Nebraska says f*ck it and gives their delegates to Cruz. Is this how it works?Same way the Dems use Super Delegates to pad HRC. Remember, most of the states aren't winner take all. It's not like how we vote for President with an electoral college. The primary process is a complete mess and each state makes their own rules.
So you acknowledge he's less than Sanders. Keep it fair and balanced.
in your world 36% = owning.Over the last 2 days of state polls...about 14 each...Trump averages 36% and Sanders averages 32. Even common core math says trump has more support.