I've already said too much.Are you saying that Dmils prison time is related to fraud involving Buddy Valestro?
"or we try her in the public eye with her campaign. One way or another she's going to have to face these charges."
No better person to weigh in on a politician walking the thin line of legality.Tom DeLay, a Texas Republican and Washington Times radio host, said: "One way or another either she's going to be indicted and that process begins, or we try her in the public eye with her campaign. One way or another she's going to have to face these charges."
Are we seriously looking at a Trump nomination? What a disaster. He's an awful human being, I seriously cannot imaging that the actual primary voting will look anything like the polling.
Tom DeLay, a Texas Republican and Washington Times radio host, said: "One way or another either she's going to be indicted and that process begins, or ......"
This thread will be some good reading once the FBI finishes their investigation.
Is that a quote from 2009?Investigation should be wrapped up in next month or so.
Of the board. You heard Tom Delay. It's definitely going to happen or not.Vegas odds on a Hillary indictment?
Yes. I know you don't get this, but you can't do what she did as it's against the law. What you haven't understood from the beginning, is that she didn't tell anyone she was using her own server. Therefore, it was never able to be secured by the Gov. This stuff on the server is Gov property and highly classified. See, this is against the law to hanle national security information in this manner. I know you haven't gotten it from the beginning. You can't do this. The only reason it came out was when Benghazi committee went looking into her emails and realized it wasn't on a gov server.This isn't Colin Powell as he cleared and had his served secured.They have 150 people investigating questionable email server security that had no known negative outcome?
They should blame themselves as everyone has know about this and why they tried to get Biden in the race. The pressure will be on Loretta Lynch to indict. However, if we get to that point, politically the damage will be done; especially when Patreaus, a military hero was hung on the other side for much less.If she is indicted, who will the Dems and MSNBC blame?
It would be too easy if a Republican was in the White House.
The pressure will be on Loretta Lynch to indict. However, if we get to that point, politically the damage will be done
It's been stated multiple times in this thread. Just scroll through it.What law exactly? Or is it just a state department guideline? What controls are in place to prevent illicit email servers? Are they enforced? How frequently?
I only recall you dodging that question previously, not answering it. Well, whatever law it is, I hope that this crazy corporate whore doesn't bring Colin Powell down with her.It's been stated multiple times in this thread. Just scroll through it.
If there is a better reason than the above pic to not vote for Hillary, I haven't found it yet.
They should blame themselves
How about the one where they asked her to release the transcript of her Goldman speeches and she just laughed in their face. It really chaps my ass that Mitt Romney was vilified for being wealthy and successful yet the Clintons get around $250-500k a speaking engagement and the liberal, hipster-esque youth blindly support her still!That was a good one. Thanks for the laugh.
I saw that a youngster (who is ostensibly 'feelin the Bern') called out Hillary during some 'town hall' event.
He said something along the lines of "a lot of my friends tell me that you are dishonest."
The look on her face was priceless. She visibly recoiled.
I heard that she sometimes read emails while not in a pentagon basement bunker, in violation of over 1900 federal laws.If there is a better reason than the above pic to not vote for Hillary, I haven't found it yet.
How about the one where they asked her to release the transcript of her Goldman speeches and she just laughed in their face. It really chaps my ass that Mitt Romney was vilified for being wealthy and successful yet the Clintons get around $250-500k a speaking engagement and the liberal, hipster-esque youth blindly support her still!
They should negotiate a lower fee!!How about the one where they asked her to release the transcript of her Goldman speeches and she just laughed in their face. It really chaps my ass that Mitt Romney was vilified for being wealthy and successful yet the Clintons get around $250-500k a speaking engagement and the liberal, hipster-esque youth blindly support her still!
They should negotiate a lower fee!!