Anyone else more excited about this tournament than the last few US Opens? I love watching these guys hack it up on a tricked up course. Can't wait to hear all of the complaining.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe it's now called Copa del golf de los Estados Unidos.Are you comfortable with the tournament's new name-------L'Open de USA?
Explain "tricked"? Fast greens and heavy rough?
If this is what the USGA needs to do in order to keep the tournament at these classic courses, then I'm all for it. I'd rather watch this than a bunch of Chambers Bay tournaments, or 8000 yard behemoths that are only good for tour pros.I think its gonna be impossibly hard. todays golfers do not find many fairways, they bomb it off the tee and then can usually hit it close from anywhere. not this week, the rough is so thick anything off the fairway is basically a one or two shot penalty. I think its a joke what the USGA has done to the US Open. A course like Oakmont doesnt need to be tricked out and made incredibly tough, it already is.
wining score is +7
Justin Rose won at Merion at +1. this will be the hardest US Open since the last time it was at Oakmont in 07 where Cabrbera beat Tiger with a final score of +5, when Els won in 94 he was -4, Miller was -5 in 73 and Nelson was -4 in 83.
the USGA tricks out there courses to take length out of play. make the greens fast but make the rough tough but playable.
Fluffing lies = cheatingMy partner is a member and played it two weekends ago. He said they stopped keeping score and we're fluffing their lies in the rough. He's a plus 2. Said it was possible.
See, I am the total opposite. I don't want to see someone play 4 rounds of golf in 20 under par. It makes me sick to know how much better these guys are than I am.of all the majors i like the Masters the best. players can go -5 over the last 9 to win the event. at the US Opens version of Oakmont if you play the back nine at +1 or +2 youll probably win. id rather see birdies.
Yes, these guys were a bunch of scratch golfers and said the course was so hard they cheated and stopped keeping score. It was too tough for them.Fluffing lies = cheating
Is that what the bois are calling it nowadays?fluffing their lies.
Impossible, damn phone
I was at the 1953 Open at Oakmont, and we all know who won. The Open that was really jazzed up was Winged Foot
in 1974 when Hale Irwin won at about nine over; that happened because the year before Miller shot something like
Foot. The USGA made When spectators asked at that tourney were asked if they were looking for golf balls they responded
that they were looking for players.
At Merion in 2013, three was unfair at 270 into the wind; the green at five at 530 was impossible; the tee ball at eighteen was simply too hard.
But they either rebuilt/ changed both twelve and 15 greens. In 2013 at Merion how many short second shots rolled sixty yards down hill.
18 at Merion was 521 yards. Uphill the entire way, green sloping hard from front to back. No birdies. #5 has a ridiculous right to left slope. I think there might have been one birdie there all week.I was at the 1953 Open at Oakmont, and we all know who won. The Open that was really jazzed up was Winged Foot
in 1974 when Hale Irwin won at about nine over; that happened because the year before Miller shot something like
Foot. The USGA made When spectators asked at that tourney were asked if they were looking for golf balls they responded
that they were looking for players.
At Merion in 2013, three was unfair at 270 into the wind; the green at five at 530 was impossible; the tee ball at eighteen was simply too hard.
But they either rebuilt/ changed both twelve and 15 greens. In 2013 at Merion how many short second shots rolled sixty yards down hill.
18 at Merion was 521 yards. Uphill the entire way, green sloping hard from front to back. No birdies. #5 has a ridiculous right to left slope. I think there might have been one birdie there all week.
I agree. Oakmont kinda sucks.As an old timer and a purist, I think greens should be slopped from a low front to a higher back. In the little that I saw today there were maybe five holes
that the greens slopped from a high front to a low back. Miss it short and the ball rolls back down hill while a miss long has a roll off or the green into a possible bad spot seventy feet from the
hole. that ain't golf.
I'm saying not sure it's really all that much on Buck - with the right team around him he could be good at it. He's talented enough to figure it out. I just think the entire setup on Fox feels off. For a sports company that puts so much exciting, high quality, fast action sports out there, having golf as a staple just doesn't work for me. UFC, NFL Football, Big East Basketball, etc., all match that brand.Right. So go do a baseball game.
What's next?
Shakespeare in the park?
Fox needs some John Daly in its golf events to match brand?I'm saying not sure it's really all that much on Buck - with the right team around him he could be good at it. He's talented enough to figure it out. I just think the entire setup on Fox feels off. For a sports company that puts so much exciting, high quality, fast action sports out there, having golf as a staple just doesn't work for me. UFC, NFL Football, Big East Basketball, etc., all match that brand.
Sorta, I guess I'm more saying if you threw Buck into a US Open and had ESPN or NBC cover it with the rest of their crews, he'd be pretty solid with some practice. Golf as a sport doesn't fit into the rest of Fox's portfolio.Fox needs some John Daly in its golf events to match brand?
UFC, NFL Football, Big East Basketball, etc., all match that brand.