ADVERTISEMENT

POLL: POLL: Bench Warmers Republican Primary

Candidate of the Republican Party for President of the United States

  • Jeb Bush

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • Ben Carson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris Christie

    Votes: 5 13.2%
  • Ted Cruz

    Votes: 5 13.2%
  • Carly Fiorina

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • John Kasich

    Votes: 6 15.8%
  • Rand Paul

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • Marco Rubio

    Votes: 8 21.1%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 12 31.6%

  • Total voters
    38
  • Poll closed .
No, effective regulation is the key. We had plenty of entities who were responsible to oversee this stuff and they all failed. What good is more regulation if it doesn't work. Part of the problem was more regulation and mandating/inducing lending to people who shouldn't have been buying a house. This was some of the stuff the Maxine Waters and Barney Frank's of the world pushed. We have sold two false dreams in this country: everyone should own a home and go to college. Some people have no business owning a home. Some people have no business in college and should learn a trade. However, if we say that we are somehow disadvantaging or descriminating against individuals or groups. It helped fed the problem. However, don't kid yourself. It was a systemic failure led by greed (lenders and those accepting the loads), stupidity and failure to enforce the regulations/checks the system had in place. However, it's easier to just blame the banks, ignore reality and say we need "more regulation". Whatever the heck that means.
Fair analysis. But it was mostly the banks. None of it happens without the banks' f*cking up on every level for years.
 
An argument can be made that regulations help the biggest banks at the expense of smaller ones, because the big banks can afford to get around said regulations. This theory, which I subscribe to in part, makes the case that further regulatory change only makes the Goldman Sachs' of the world even more powerful.

Lloyd Blankfein agrees.
 
Ohio and others.

It's likely that Iowa or Colorado or possibly both will flip R, but the GOP still needs to flip two of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Virginia or one of the aforementioned two states.

The most likely path to the presidency for a GOP president using only swing states:

R Wins: Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, and Iowa
D Wins: Virginia, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and Nevada

With no other states flipping from 2012, that would make it 288 R 250 D
 
PA needs to stop being called a swing state. Hasn't gone red since 1988. Republicans keep thinking they will win here. Never happen. The solid blue of CoP and surrounding counties is always enough to carry whole state.
 
Can we get some more reverse snobbery origins stories? I'm dying to know if we can find someone on 4.6 whose family tree is without struggle or some type of bland 'merican dream story. The entire world was a craphole a few generations ago compared to the theme park that we live in now.

Are you saying that immigrants have done nothing right?
 
Which banks? Who wrote these loans. You could argue the credit agencies were just as bad. They all sucked.
I now understand why you think the Dems are debating the issues and the Repubs are throwing red meat.


KMIL, listening these two argue over who is more liberal, attacking each other over who took what contributions and acknowledging none of their proposals are grounded in reality. Just the issues, right.....
 
PA needs to stop being called a swing state. Hasn't gone red since 1988. Republicans keep thinking they will win here. Never happen. The solid blue of CoP and surrounding counties is always enough to carry whole state.
A decade of importing fracker republicans from Texas and they can't even loosen the grip of the Southeastern PA socialist machine.
 
PA needs to stop being called a swing state. Hasn't gone red since 1988. Republicans keep thinking they will win here. Never happen. The solid blue of CoP and surrounding counties is always enough to carry whole state.
This is an example of bad conventional wisdom. Pennyslvania has been trending red.

If blacks had turned out at the same rates as they had in 2004, Romney likely would have won the state. Also, Obama ran up bigger than normal margins with black voters than a generic D candidate.

The question for 2016 is whether two-thirds of black voters will turn out for a 70 year old white woman.
 
This is an example of bad conventional wisdom. Pennyslvania has been trending red.

If blacks had turned out at the same rates as they had in 2004, Romney likely would have won the state. Also, Obama ran up bigger than normal margins with black voters than a generic D candidate.

The question for 2016 is whether two-thirds of black voters will turn out for a 70 year old white woman.

Yes...when running against Trump/Cruz/Rubio and Obama campaigning with her and Cory Booker as her running mate.
 
Ooooh boy. The hOpe would be strong in that ticket.
Zero chance Booker is VP. HRC (unless she implodes before being the nominee) will NEVER have someone as undisciplined and social media crazy as Booker. She's way too much of a control freak to have Booker. Also, she doesn't need him because she'll have Obama. And I say this as someone who personally likes Booker. But he's too big a liability for that stage/HRC.
 
Last edited:
African-American guy is so 2008. They already checked that box. It will be Julian Castro. Got to compete with Rubio for the Cuban-hispanic vote.
 
Booker is not going to be the VP nominee. It's going to be Julian Castro, arguably the most unqualified person to ever serve as a cabinet secretary and would be far and away the least qualified VP candidate on a major party's ticket in recent history. His political experience amounts to being the symbolic mayor in San Antonio's council-manager city government and being appointed to run one of America's least efficient federal agencies in HUD.

What's more is that Castro doesn't speak Spanish. Rubio would be doing ads for himself on Spanish language television while Hillary picks a 42 year old token hispanic guy who doesn't speak the language. If it happens, and I believe it will, people will see through it for the craven stunt that it is.
 
In fairness, he's more qualified than Sarah Palin.....or equally unqualified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickleDimer
Palin was a Mayor, a chairperson of a statewide agency, and an elected governor of a state. I don't like Palin and thought it was a mistake for McCain to pick her, but she was unquestionably more qualified than Castro.
 
It's also worth noting that Palin was an effective governor who had real achievements to speak of.
 
Foye, Alaska doesn't count. Palin wasn't qualified to deliver pizza. The woman is a moron.
 
....Palin was an effective governor who had real achievements to speak of.

What were her achievements? (I don't doubt they were grand...but I had never heard of Palin at the time she was nominated, so I'm unaware of what they were.)
 
The Alaska natural gas pipeline and reducing the Alaska state government's reliance on federal earmarks, which was a third rail in Alaskan politics for decades.
 
Being the governor of Alaska is the equivalent of winning the BWs Field of 64 tournament.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adp98
The Alaska natural gas pipeline and reducing the Alaska state government's reliance on federal earmarks, which was a third rail in Alaskan politics for decades.
Where would we all be without the ability to search the internet?
 
Note, ADP being fair and balanced here. A good lesson.
I'm not sure I can bring myself to enthusiastically support Rubio who I think will be the ultimate GOP nominee. He is too scripted for me. I suppose I'd vote for ANYONE over HRC but it would just be the lesser of two evils.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT