When I watch basketball I keep coming back to positional flexibility. It's become so important to what the game is now. Guys who can switch pick and rolls. Guys who can play multiple positions and do multiple things. Guys that dont destroy you on one end of the floor. Okafor kinda reminds me of Enes Kanter. Incredibly skilled offensively but a turnstile at the other end, and generally useless without the ball. When you watch the finals you're gonna see 2 teams playing Draymond and Frye at center. Guys like Kanter and Okafor cannot guard these dudes on the perimeter. I really am of the belief, though, that the Thunder couldve, and wouldve beaten the Warriors had they consistently utilized Kanter and Adams more in the post. Those guys were having their way but they went away from them too often to play hero ball on the perimeter. Having good bigs IS still a luxury in the NBA but its hard for teams to get out of a perimeter-oriented mindset today. You can still build, and win, around bigs in the NBA today but it has to be around the sort of bigs who dont get you torched trying to guard smaller dudes in today's NBA. Delicate balance there. Just because Golden St is winning chips behind the 2 best shooters of all time doesnt mean thats the only way to build a winner. Guys that shoot like that dont exactly fall off trees. However, it's obvious you need a good amount of perimeter shooting to survive.
Sixers have a very difficult decision to make here. I envy them and I dont envy them at the same time.