Exactly USMC. Of course it didn't effect the players direct performance on the field. There are no sanctions that have been applied because some booster gave a player a house and that made him twice as fast. Your logic there really doesn't make any sense to me. To me it's kind of the like the opposite of providing impermissible benefits. Instead of coaches giving cash or homes or cars which make the school look positive in the recruits eyes, Paterno buried/didn't do anything (or some will say enough) regarding this story because it would have put the school in a poor light and would have hurt recruiting therefore hurting the product on the field. Don't really get your line of reasoning regarding it not making the players play better but it surely would have effected the skill levels of the players that they did get.