West Virginia T&F seems to have come a long way - all three divisions (A, AA, AAA) had 1600M times under 4:24 in the last few years, including a 4:08 in the A division. 4:08 is a free ride to college. Very impressive jump.
West Virginia T&F seems to have come a long way - all three divisions (A, AA, AAA) had 1600M times under 4:24 in the last few years, including a 4:08 in the A division. 4:08 is a free ride to college. Very impressive jump.
Those represent the top time in the entire state. So if you had a state winner at 4:24 that would seem to be in line with what it was 20 years ago. I'm stunned the one kid ran a sub 4:10, especially at the A level. He must be a mountain man. That's an unbelievable time out of WV. Cap tip to that kid.West Virginia T&F seems to have come a long way - all three divisions (A, AA, AAA) had 1600M times under 4:24 in the last few years, including a 4:08 in the A division. 4:08 is a free ride to college. Very impressive jump.
Agree and let's put this in perspective of the question and my response.4:45 would have won some races in the WV OVAC A or AA divisions this year. I'll buy it, but let's put it on par with little league accomplishments.
Those represent the top time in the entire state. So if you had a state winner at 4:24 that would seem to be in line with what it was 20 years ago. I'm stunned the one kid ran a sub 4:10, especially at the A level. He must be a mountain man. That's an unbelievable time out of WV. Cap tip to that kid.
aren't the great marathoners all shorts guys from Kenya?I'm fascinated by the height of long distance runners. Is it correct to say that if you're too tall, your bones/joints can't take it and if you're too short, your stride doesn't allow you to keep pace?
I'm fascinated by the height of long distance runners. Is it correct to say that if you're too tall, your bones/joints can't take it and if you're too short, your stride doesn't allow you to keep pace?
Racist.aren't the great marathoners all shorts guys from Kenya?
The one race I always felt that size mattered most was the 400. Short guys like me simply could not compete in that race for the very reason you cited. You had to take those long strides all the way around the track. IMO, that was the hardest race in all of track. It combined everything into the most basic/physically demanding race. You essentially sprint for nearly 400 yards.I have no idea. That was just my uneducated assumption. I guess they just look tall because they have long legs for 5'6" and are emaciated.
I could see that argument as well. Especially as you move up in competition. 400 to me was simply a race where you had to be at least 6'2 to cover ground. 800 someone with my built would be better-suited to compete with the extended distance.http://fittish.deadspin.com/an-exercise-physiologist-explains-why-800-meters-hurts-1694552448
This is a good article about why the 800m is the hardest race to run. Basically, it's not a sprint and not a distance race. You basically have to choose whether you are going to run a fast 400m then tire on the 2nd lap or take an easy first 400 then run a negative split. Either way, you are going to be dying at the end.
Do they sell men's stuff in a regular LuLu Lemon store? I seriously had no idea they even had a men's line. Only time I've ever been in there was this past December when I went to buy my wife some yoga pants. I will say, the girls working there were extremely helpful, almost over the top. I think I got asked if I needed help about four times and I was in there under ten minutes. Then again I probably looked completely clueless thumbing through women's yoga pants.