Will miss rand. Was nice to have someone in the field that believes civil liberties include things beyond gun ownership and isn't bought into the war machine. guy is only 53 so expect we see him again, just not sure he fits in the GOP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he doesn't believe in these things (or at least fakes believe in them) he should run as a Democrat.Will miss rand. Was nice to have someone in the field that believes civil liberties include things beyond gun ownership and isn't bought into the war machine. guy is only 53 so expect we see him again, just not sure he fits in the GOP.
If he doesn't believe in these things (or at least fakes believe in them) he should run as a Democrat.
Rand is a cross between a paleoconservative and a libertarian. I don't know if that's a good thing.Will miss rand. Was nice to have someone in the field that believes civil liberties include things beyond gun ownership and isn't bought into the war machine. guy is only 53 so expect we see him again, just not sure he fits in the GOP.
I care about the plight of the inner city poor. I don't care about white people who pretend to be black nationalists on an inet newsgroup.What about fake internet black people like the asshat above?
I care about the plight of the inner city poor.
What about fake internet black people like the asshat above?
who is this question even directed to, you semi-literate hack?
Rick Santorum endorsed Marco Rubio tonight! That's fantastic and both Santorum supporters may now vote for Rubio.You're asking that and I'm the semi-literate one?
Try and sell stuff (Santorum coffee mugs) on Sarah Palin's show to pay for his campaign debt.What does Rick Santorum do now for the next 3 yrs, 6 mos or so?
Hillary would be best for business. Gridlock in Congress bad.GOP will control the House and Senate will be a slim margin. Dems are best for business, activist government.
Kmil, I don't understand your post. You watched a Dem town hall and that provided an opinion on the GOP? I'm confused.
I watched part of the replay and Bernie was great. HRC was her usual shrill self stumbling all over herself a lot trying to cover her multitude of positions on a multitude of topics.Just caught a bit of the dem town hall. The GOP is going to have a very hard time connecting to a majority of Americans with their ongoing bitter whining and hate filled rhetoric. Seriously...good luck adp with finding a winner in that group.
Hillary would be best for business. Gridlock in Congress bad.GOP will control the House and Senate will be a slim margin. Dems are best for business, activist government.
Kmil, I don't understand your post. You watched a Dem town hall and that provided an opinion on the GOP? I'm confused.
Hillary would be best for business. Gridlock in Congress bad.GOP will control the House and Senate will be a slim margin. Dems are best for business, activist government.
Red meat like Wall Street is to blame, the system is rigged and class warfare/inequality. One man's red meat is another's pork. You don't even know your own bias. You missed the part last night where Sanders and HRC talked about how Obama failed progressives and they discussed who was more anti-Wall Street as they shamed HRC for taking almost $700K from Goldman in speaking fees. But hey, that's different right because we're standing up for the little guy.
He doesn't attack the candidate just the entire free market economy.Maybe it's the way its all presented. Sanders said it best: He will call out differences on the issues he believes in, but not attack any other candidate personally. That resonates particularly when you compare the way the GOP candidates do things. Not sure how you can't see the difference.
"We are always wary of guiding for mean reversion. But, if we are wrong and high margins manage to endure for the next few years (particularly when global demand growth is below trend), there are broader questions to be asked about the efficacy of capitalism."He doesn't attack the candidate just the entire free market economy.
He doesn't attack the candidate just the entire free market economy.
I liked Rubio until this.Rick Santorum endorsed Marco Rubio tonight! That's fantastic and both Santorum supporters may now vote for Rubio.
Most bottom lines or just bottom lines that are feeding at the gov't trough?The tea party guys are the worst for most bottom lines.
Not my bottom line.Most bottom lines or just bottom lines that are feeding at the gov't trough?
I now understand why you think the Dems are debating the issues and the Repubs are throwing red meat.He's attacking big banks, who single-handedly destroyed the world's economy in 2007. The idea of a free market economy sounds great, but in actual practice just doesn't work. Every time barriers/regulations are removed from the equation, people fck it up.
So it was just the banks. Clueless. How about congress, small banks, lenders, regulators, and lastly the idiots who all thought they were the next Donald Trump. No personal responsibility. I'm all for hammering the banks but this was systemic failure. Question, wad lending money to people who could not afford it in the name of equality a good idea? Bernie sanders and barney frank thought it was. Nothing to see here, we had no role it was the evil big banks. Ignorant on every level.He's attacking big banks, who single-handedly destroyed the world's economy in 2007. The idea of a free market economy sounds great, but in actual practice just doesn't work. Every time barriers/regulations are removed from the equation, people fck it up.
Don't forget the credit ratings agencies!So it was just the banks. Clueless. How about congress, small banks, lenders, regulators, and lastly the idiots who all thought they were the next Donald Trump. No personal responsibility. I'm all for hammering the banks but this was systemic failure. Question, wad lending money to people who could not afford it in the name of equality a good idea? Bernie sanders and barney frank thought it was. Nothing to see here, we had no role it was the evil big banks. Ignorant on every level.
So it was just the banks. Clueless. How about congress, small banks, lenders, regulators, and lastly the idiots who all thought they were the next Donald Trump. No personal responsibility. I'm all for hammering the banks but this was systemic failure. Question, wad lending money to people who could not afford it in the name of equality a good idea? Bernie sanders and barney frank thought it was. Nothing to see here, we had no role it was the evil big banks. Ignorant on every level.
Yes, I completely forgot them.Don't forget the credit ratings agencies!
No, effective regulation is the key. We had plenty of entities who were responsible to oversee this stuff and they all failed. What good is more regulation if it doesn't work. Part of the problem was more regulation and mandating/inducing lending to people who shouldn't have been buying a house. This was some of the stuff the Maxine Waters and Barney Frank's of the world pushed. We have sold two false dreams in this country: everyone should own a home and go to college. Some people have no business owning a home. Some people have no business in college and should learn a trade. However, if we say that we are somehow disadvantaging or descriminating against individuals or groups. It helped fed the problem. However, don't kid yourself. It was a systemic failure led by greed (lenders and those accepting the loads), stupidity and failure to enforce the regulations/checks the system had in place. However, it's easier to just blame the banks, ignore reality and say we need "more regulation". Whatever the heck that means.So you agree at least that more regulation and not less is the way to go?
Did you just become a Tea Partier? ND for Cruz!Most bottom lines or just bottom lines that are feeding at the gov't trough?